CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Jenoptik JD 8.0 exclusiv
vs Jenoptik JD 8.0z3 EasyShot

Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 8.0 exclusiv

Jenoptik / 2008

JD 8.0 exclusiv

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 8.0z3 EasyShot

Jenoptik / 2008

JD 8.0z3 EasyShot

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
JD 8.0 exclusiv
38 mm²
JD 8.0z3 EasyShot
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The JD 8.0 exclusiv and JD 8.0z3 EasyShot have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

JD 8.0 exclusivMetricJD 8.0z3 EasyShot
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.18 µmPixel pitch2.18 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area4.74 µm²
21.11 MP/cm²Pixel density21.11 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight140 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The JD 8.0 exclusiv and JD 8.0z3 EasyShot have the same sensor area. The JD 8.0 exclusiv and JD 8.0z3 EasyShot have the same body weight. The JD 8.0 exclusiv and JD 8.0z3 EasyShot have the same effective resolution. The JD 8.0 exclusiv and JD 8.0z3 EasyShot were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose JD 8.0 exclusiv

Released in 2008, JD 8.0 exclusiv has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose JD 8.0z3 EasyShot

Released in 2008, JD 8.0z3 EasyShot has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras