Reasons to choose JD 4360z
Released in 2004, JD 4360z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Jenoptik JD 4360z
vs Olympus C-4000 Zoom
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
JD 4360z38 mm²
C-4000 Zoom- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The JD 4360z and C-4000 Zoom have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
JD 4360zMetricC-4000 Zoom
4 MPEffective pixels3.9 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch3.12 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area9.72 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density10.29 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight415 g
Secure DigitalStorageSmartMedia
2x AABatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The JD 4360z and C-4000 Zoom have the same sensor area. The JD 4360z has the lighter body. The JD 4360z has the higher effective resolution. The JD 4360z is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose C-4000 Zoom
Released in 2002, C-4000 Zoom has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.9 MP effective resolution, and a 415 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.