Reasons to choose JD 3.3 xz3
Released in 2003, JD 3.3 xz3 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 210 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Jenoptik JD 3.3 xz3
vs Jenoptik JD 3.3z10
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
JD 3.3 xz321 mm²
JD 3.3z10- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The JD 3.3 xz3 and JD 3.3z10 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
JD 3.3 xz3MetricJD 3.3z10
3.1 MPEffective pixels3.34 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.62 µmPixel pitch2.53 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area6.38 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density15.67 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
210 gWeight342 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery4x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The JD 3.3 xz3 and JD 3.3z10 have the same sensor area. The JD 3.3 xz3 has the lighter body. The JD 3.3z10 has the higher effective resolution. The JD 3.3 xz3 and JD 3.3z10 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose JD 3.3z10
Released in 2003, JD 3.3z10 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 342 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.