Reasons to choose JD 3.3 AF
Released in 2003, JD 3.3 AF has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.3 MP effective resolution, and a 175 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Jenoptik JD 3.3 AF
vs Jenoptik JD 3.3 xz3
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
JD 3.3 AF21 mm²
JD 3.3 xz3- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The JD 3.3 AF and JD 3.3 xz3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
JD 3.3 AFMetricJD 3.3 xz3
3.3 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.54 µmPixel pitch2.62 µm
6.46 µm²Pixel area6.88 µm²
15.48 MP/cm²Pixel density14.54 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
175 gWeight210 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The JD 3.3 AF and JD 3.3 xz3 have the same sensor area. The JD 3.3 AF has the lighter body. The JD 3.3 AF has the higher effective resolution. The JD 3.3 AF and JD 3.3 xz3 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose JD 3.3 xz3
Released in 2003, JD 3.3 xz3 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 210 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.