CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Jenoptik JD 2100 AF
vs Jenoptik JD 2100 M

Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 2100 AF

Jenoptik / 2002

JD 2100 AF

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 2100 M

Jenoptik / 2002

JD 2100 M

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
JD 2100 AF
21 mm²
JD 2100 M
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The JD 2100 AF and JD 2100 M have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

JD 2100 AFMetricJD 2100 M
2.11 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.18 µmPixel pitch3.18 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area10.1 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density9.9 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
180 gWeight256 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
4x AABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The JD 2100 AF and JD 2100 M have the same sensor area. The JD 2100 AF has the lighter body. The JD 2100 AF and JD 2100 M have the same effective resolution. The JD 2100 AF and JD 2100 M were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose JD 2100 AF

Released in 2002, JD 2100 AF has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose JD 2100 M

Released in 2002, JD 2100 M has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 256 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras