CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP Photosmart R742
vs HP Photosmart R837

Archive illustration for HP Photosmart R742

HP / 2007

Photosmart R742

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP Photosmart R837

HP / 2007

Photosmart R837

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Photosmart R742
25 mm²
Photosmart R837
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Photosmart R742 and Photosmart R837 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Photosmart R742MetricPhotosmart R837
7 MPEffective pixels7.4 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.88 µmPixel pitch1.83 µm
3.55 µm²Pixel area3.36 µm²
28.18 MP/cm²Pixel density29.79 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
136 gWeight155 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
HP Lithium-Ion rechargeable supplied Li-ion batteryBatteryHP Lithium-Ion rechargeable supplied Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Photosmart R742 and Photosmart R837 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart R742 has the lighter body. The Photosmart R837 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart R742 and Photosmart R837 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Photosmart R742

Released in 2007, Photosmart R742 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7 MP effective resolution, and a 136 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Photosmart R837

Released in 2007, Photosmart R837 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.4 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras