Reasons to choose Photosmart R717
Released in 2005, Photosmart R717 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.2 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP Photosmart R717
vs HP Photosmart R967
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Photosmart R71738 mm²
Photosmart R967- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Photosmart R717 and Photosmart R967 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Photosmart R717MetricPhotosmart R967
6.2 MPEffective pixels10.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.47 µmPixel pitch1.94 µm
6.11 µm²Pixel area3.75 µm²
16.36 MP/cm²Pixel density26.65 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
180 gWeight190 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
HP Lithium-Ion rechargeable supplied Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Photosmart R717 and Photosmart R967 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart R717 has the lighter body. The Photosmart R967 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart R967 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Photosmart R967
Released in 2006, Photosmart R967 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.