Reasons to choose Photosmart E327
Released in 2006, Photosmart E327 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 108 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP Photosmart E327
vs HP Photosmart M425
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Photosmart E32725 mm²
Photosmart M425- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Photosmart E327 and Photosmart M425 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Photosmart E327MetricPhotosmart M425
5 MPEffective pixels5 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.23 µmPixel pitch2.23 µm
4.97 µm²Pixel area4.97 µm²
20.13 MP/cm²Pixel density20.13 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
108 gWeight139 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Photosmart E327 and Photosmart M425 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart E327 has the lighter body. The Photosmart E327 and Photosmart M425 have the same effective resolution. The Photosmart E327 and Photosmart M425 were both released in 2006. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Photosmart M425
Released in 2006, Photosmart M425 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 139 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.