Reasons to choose Photosmart 435
Released in 2003, Photosmart 435 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 133 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP Photosmart 435
vs HP Photosmart 735
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
Photosmart 43521 mm²
Photosmart 735- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Photosmart 435 and Photosmart 735 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Photosmart 435MetricPhotosmart 735
3.34 MPEffective pixels3.34 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.53 µmPixel pitch2.53 µm
6.38 µm²Pixel area6.38 µm²
15.67 MP/cm²Pixel density15.67 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
133 gWeight290 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Photosmart 435 and Photosmart 735 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart 435 has the lighter body. The Photosmart 435 and Photosmart 735 have the same effective resolution. The Photosmart 435 and Photosmart 735 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Photosmart 735
Released in 2003, Photosmart 735 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 290 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.