Reasons to choose Photosmart 120
Released in 2003, Photosmart 120 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP Photosmart 120
vs HP Photosmart 935
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
Photosmart 12038 mm²
Photosmart 935- Area ratio
- 1.23:1
- Absolute difference
- 7 mm²
- Relative difference
- 23.4%
The Photosmart 935 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Photosmart 120MetricPhotosmart 935
1 MPEffective pixels5.24 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor7.11 × 5.33
5.54 µmPixel pitch2.69 µm
30.72 µm²Pixel area7.23 µm²
3.26 MP/cm²Pixel density13.83 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
260 gWeight260 g
CompactFlash type IStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
4x AABatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Photosmart 935 has the larger sensor area. The Photosmart 120 and Photosmart 935 have the same body weight. The Photosmart 935 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart 120 and Photosmart 935 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Photosmart 935
Released in 2003, Photosmart 935 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.24 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.