CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP CW450t
vs HP SW450

Archive illustration for HP CW450t

HP / 2010

CW450t

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP SW450

HP / 2010

SW450

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
CW450t
28 mm²
SW450
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The CW450t and SW450 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

CW450tMetricSW450
12.5 MPEffective pixels12.5 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.51 µmPixel pitch1.51 µm
2.28 µm²Pixel area2.28 µm²
43.92 MP/cm²Pixel density43.92 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight100 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The CW450t and SW450 have the same sensor area. The SW450 has the lighter body. The CW450t and SW450 have the same effective resolution. The CW450t and SW450 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CW450t

Released in 2010, CW450t has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.5 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose SW450

Released in 2010, SW450 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.5 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras