Reasons to choose CA350
Released in 2009, CA350 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP CA350
vs HP SB360
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
CA35028 mm²
SB360- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The CA350 and SB360 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
CA350MetricSB360
10 MPEffective pixels12.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.53 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.33 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density42.87 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
—Battery—
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The CA350 and SB360 have the same sensor area. The CA350 and SB360 have the same body weight. The SB360 has the higher effective resolution. The CA350 and SB360 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose SB360
Released in 2009, SB360 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.