CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

GE E1250TW
vs GE G3WP

Archive illustration for GE E1250TW

GE / 2009

E1250TW

Full specifications
VS

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
E1250TW
28 mm²
G3WP
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The E1250TW and G3WP have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

E1250TWMetricG3WP
12.2 MPEffective pixels12.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.53 µmPixel pitch1.53 µm
2.33 µm²Pixel area2.33 µm²
42.87 MP/cm²Pixel density42.87 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight120 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery—

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The E1250TW and G3WP have the same sensor area. The G3WP has the lighter body. The E1250TW and G3WP have the same effective resolution. The E1250TW and G3WP were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose E1250TW

Released in 2009, E1250TW has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose G3WP

Released in 2009, G3WP has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras