Reasons to choose E1050
Released in 2008, E1050 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.7 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
GE E1050
vs GE E1050 TW
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
E105028 mm²
E1050 TW- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The E1050 and E1050 TW have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
E1050MetricE1050 TW
10.7 MPEffective pixels10.1 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.61 µmPixel pitch1.66 µm
2.59 µm²Pixel area2.75 µm²
38.59 MP/cm²Pixel density36.43 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The E1050 and E1050 TW have the same sensor area. The E1050 TW has the lighter body. The E1050 has the higher effective resolution. The E1050 and E1050 TW were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose E1050 TW
Released in 2008, E1050 TW has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.