CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

GE E1050 TW
vs GE G2

Archive illustration for GE E1050 TW

GE / 2008

E1050 TW

Full specifications
VS

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
E1050 TW
27 mm²
G2
Area ratio
1.02:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
1.7%

The E1050 TW has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

E1050 TWMetricG2
10.1 MPEffective pixels8.31 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.03 × 4.52
1.66 µmPixel pitch1.81 µm
2.75 µm²Pixel area3.28 µm²
36.43 MP/cm²Pixel density30.49 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.74
—Maximum video—
—Weight95 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The E1050 TW has the larger sensor area. The E1050 TW has the lighter body. The E1050 TW has the higher effective resolution. The E1050 TW and G2 were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose E1050 TW

Released in 2008, E1050 TW has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose G2

Released in 2008, G2 has about 27 mm² of sensor area, 8.31 MP effective resolution, and a 95 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras