CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

GE A1050
vs GE A950

Archive illustration for GE A1050

GE / 2009

A1050

Full specifications
VS

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
A1050
28 mm²
A950
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The A1050 and A950 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

A1050MetricA950
10.1 MPEffective pixels9.1 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.66 µmPixel pitch1.75 µm
2.75 µm²Pixel area3.05 µm²
36.43 MP/cm²Pixel density32.82 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight145 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The A1050 and A950 have the same sensor area. The A1050 and A950 have the same body weight. The A1050 has the higher effective resolution. The A1050 and A950 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose A1050

Released in 2009, A1050 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose A950

Released in 2009, A950 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 9.1 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras