CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

GE A1030
vs GE E1050 TW

Archive illustration for GE A1030

GE / 2008

A1030

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for GE E1050 TW

GE / 2008

E1050 TW

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
A1030
28 mm²
E1050 TW
Area ratio
1.53:1
Absolute difference
15 mm²
Relative difference
53.2%

The A1030 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

A1030MetricE1050 TW
10.1 MPEffective pixels10.1 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor6.08 × 4.56
2.05 µmPixel pitch1.66 µm
4.2 µm²Pixel area2.75 µm²
23.78 MP/cm²Pixel density36.43 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The A1030 has the larger sensor area. The A1030 and E1050 TW have the same body weight. The A1030 and E1050 TW have the same effective resolution. The A1030 and E1050 TW were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose A1030

Released in 2008, A1030 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose E1050 TW

Released in 2008, E1050 TW has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras