Reasons to choose X100F
Released in 2017, X100F has about 368 mm² of sensor area, 24.3 MP effective resolution, and a 469 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Fujifilm X100F
vs Leica TL2
VS
Sensor area
368 mm²
X100F371 mm²
TL2- Area ratio
- 1.01:1
- Absolute difference
- 2 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0.6%
The TL2 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
X100FMetricTL2
24.3 MPEffective pixels24.32 MP
23.6 × 15.6Sensor23.6 × 15.7
3.89 µmPixel pitch3.9 µm
15.15 µm²Pixel area15.24 µm²
6.6 MP/cm²Pixel density6.56 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
469 gWeight399 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
NP-W126S Li-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryBP-DC13 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The TL2 has the larger sensor area. The TL2 has the lighter body. The TL2 has the higher effective resolution. The X100F and TL2 were both released in 2017. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose TL2
Released in 2017, TL2 has about 371 mm² of sensor area, 24.32 MP effective resolution, and a 399 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.