Reasons to choose X-Pro3
Released in 2019, X-Pro3 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 26.1 MP effective resolution, and a 497 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Fujifilm X-Pro3
vs Sony a6600
VS
Sensor area
367 mm²
X-Pro3367 mm²
a6600- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The X-Pro3 and a6600 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
X-Pro3Metrica6600
26.1 MPEffective pixels24.2 MP
23.5 × 15.6Sensor23.5 × 15.6
3.75 µmPixel pitch3.89 µm
14.05 µm²Pixel area15.15 µm²
7.12 MP/cm²Pixel density6.6 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
4,096 × 2,160Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
497 gWeight503 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC, MS Pro Duo
NP-W126S lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryNP-FZ1000 ilthium-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The X-Pro3 and a6600 have the same sensor area. The X-Pro3 has the lighter body. The X-Pro3 has the higher effective resolution. The X-Pro3 and a6600 were both released in 2019. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose a6600
Released in 2019, a6600 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.2 MP effective resolution, and a 503 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.