Reasons to choose X-A3
Released in 2016, X-A3 has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 24.2 MP effective resolution, and a 339 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Fujifilm X-A3
vs Leica X-U (Typ 113)
VS
Sensor area
369 mm²
X-A3371 mm²
X-U (Typ 113)- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 2 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0.4%
The X-U (Typ 113) has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
X-A3MetricX-U (Typ 113)
24.2 MPEffective pixels16.2 MP
23.5 × 15.7Sensor23.6 × 15.7
3.9 µmPixel pitch4.78 µm
15.25 µm²Pixel area22.87 µm²
6.56 MP/cm²Pixel density4.37 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
339 gWeight635 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
NP-W126S lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryBP-DC8 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The X-U (Typ 113) has the larger sensor area. The X-A3 has the lighter body. The X-A3 has the higher effective resolution. The X-A3 and X-U (Typ 113) were both released in 2016. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose X-U (Typ 113)
Released in 2016, X-U (Typ 113) has about 371 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 635 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.