Reasons to choose X-A3
Released in 2016, X-A3 has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 24.2 MP effective resolution, and a 339 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Fujifilm X-A3
vs Leica TL
VS
Sensor area
369 mm²
X-A3371 mm²
TL- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 2 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0.4%
The TL has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
X-A3MetricTL
24.2 MPEffective pixels16.3 MP
23.5 × 15.7Sensor23.6 × 15.7
3.9 µmPixel pitch4.77 µm
15.25 µm²Pixel area22.73 µm²
6.56 MP/cm²Pixel density4.4 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
339 gWeight384 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
NP-W126S lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryBP-DC 13 lithium ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The TL has the larger sensor area. The X-A3 has the lighter body. The X-A3 has the higher effective resolution. The X-A3 and TL were both released in 2016. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose TL
Released in 2016, TL has about 371 mm² of sensor area, 16.3 MP effective resolution, and a 384 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.