Reasons to choose FinePix IS Pro
Released in 2007, FinePix IS Pro has about 357 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 920 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Fujifilm FinePix IS Pro
vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
VS
Sensor area
357 mm²
FinePix IS Pro371 mm²
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5- Area ratio
- 1.04:1
- Absolute difference
- 14 mm²
- Relative difference
- 3.9%
The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
FinePix IS ProMetricGXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
6.1 MPEffective pixels16.2 MP
23 × 15.5Sensor23.6 × 15.7
7.64 µmPixel pitch4.78 µm
58.44 µm²Pixel area22.87 µm²
1.71 MP/cm²Pixel density4.37 MP/cm²
1.56Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video—
920 gWeight—
Compact Flash (Type I or II)StorageInternal storage
Lithium-Ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion DB-90 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has the larger sensor area. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has the lighter body. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has the higher effective resolution. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Released in 2009, GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has about 371 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.