CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Epson PhotoPC 650
vs Epson PhotoPC 800

Archive illustration for Epson PhotoPC 650

Epson / 1999

PhotoPC 650

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Epson PhotoPC 800

Epson / 1999

PhotoPC 800

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

17 mm²
PhotoPC 650
31 mm²
PhotoPC 800
Area ratio
1.78:1
Absolute difference
13 mm²
Relative difference
77.8%

The PhotoPC 800 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

PhotoPC 650MetricPhotoPC 800
0.9 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor6.4 × 4.8
4.38 µmPixel pitch4.02 µm
19.2 µm²Pixel area16.17 µm²
5.21 MP/cm²Pixel density6.18 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
400 gWeight280 g
Compact Flash Type IStorageCompact Flash
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA NiMH (4) batteries (supplied)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PhotoPC 800 has the larger sensor area. The PhotoPC 800 has the lighter body. The PhotoPC 800 has the higher effective resolution. The PhotoPC 650 and PhotoPC 800 were both released in 1999. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PhotoPC 650

Released in 1999, PhotoPC 650 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.9 MP effective resolution, and a 400 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PhotoPC 800

Released in 1999, PhotoPC 800 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras