Reasons to choose Eye-Q 4060AF
Released in 2003, Eye-Q 4060AF has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 118 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Concord Eye-Q 4060AF
vs Concord Eye-Q 5330z
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Eye-Q 4060AF38 mm²
Eye-Q 5330z- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Eye-Q 4060AF and Eye-Q 5330z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Eye-Q 4060AFMetricEye-Q 5330z
4 MPEffective pixels5.24 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch2.69 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area7.23 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density13.83 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
118 gWeight280 g
Secure DigitalStorageCompactFlash type I
2x AABattery4x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Eye-Q 4060AF and Eye-Q 5330z have the same sensor area. The Eye-Q 4060AF has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 5330z has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 4060AF and Eye-Q 5330z were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Eye-Q 5330z
Released in 2003, Eye-Q 5330z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.24 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.