Reasons to choose Eye-Q 3341z
Released in 2004, Eye-Q 3341z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Concord Eye-Q 3341z
vs Concord Eye-Q 5062AF
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Eye-Q 3341z38 mm²
Eye-Q 5062AF- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Eye-Q 3341z and Eye-Q 5062AF have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Eye-Q 3341zMetricEye-Q 5062AF
3.1 MPEffective pixels5.04 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.5 µmPixel pitch2.74 µm
12.22 µm²Pixel area7.52 µm²
8.18 MP/cm²Pixel density13.3 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
150 gWeight120 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Eye-Q 3341z and Eye-Q 5062AF have the same sensor area. The Eye-Q 5062AF has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 5062AF has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 3341z and Eye-Q 5062AF were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Eye-Q 5062AF
Released in 2004, Eye-Q 5062AF has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.04 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.