CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord Eye-Q 3341z
vs Concord Eye-Q 4363z

Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 3341z

Concord / 2004

Eye-Q 3341z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 4363z

Concord / 2004

Eye-Q 4363z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Eye-Q 3341z
38 mm²
Eye-Q 4363z
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Eye-Q 3341z and Eye-Q 4363z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Eye-Q 3341zMetricEye-Q 4363z
3.1 MPEffective pixels4.06 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.5 µmPixel pitch3.06 µm
12.22 µm²Pixel area9.33 µm²
8.18 MP/cm²Pixel density10.71 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
150 gWeight150 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Eye-Q 3341z and Eye-Q 4363z have the same sensor area. The Eye-Q 3341z and Eye-Q 4363z have the same body weight. The Eye-Q 4363z has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 3341z and Eye-Q 4363z were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 3341z

Released in 2004, Eye-Q 3341z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 4363z

Released in 2004, Eye-Q 4363z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.06 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras