Reasons to choose Eye-Q 3340z
Released in 2003, Eye-Q 3340z has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Concord Eye-Q 3340z
vs Concord Eye-Q Go LCD
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
Eye-Q 3340z31 mm²
Eye-Q Go LCD- Area ratio
- 1.44:1
- Absolute difference
- 9 mm²
- Relative difference
- 44.1%
The Eye-Q Go LCD has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Eye-Q 3340zMetricEye-Q Go LCD
3.2 MPEffective pixels1.3 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor6.4 × 4.8
2.58 µmPixel pitch4.86 µm
6.66 µm²Pixel area23.63 µm²
15.01 MP/cm²Pixel density4.23 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight115 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery1x CR123 Lithium
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Eye-Q Go LCD has the larger sensor area. The Eye-Q Go LCD has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 3340z has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 3340z and Eye-Q Go LCD were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Eye-Q Go LCD
Released in 2003, Eye-Q Go LCD has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.