CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord Eye-Q 3132z
vs Concord Eye-Q 4330z

Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 3132z

Concord / 2002

Eye-Q 3132z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 4330z

Concord / 2002

Eye-Q 4330z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
Eye-Q 3132z
38 mm²
Eye-Q 4330z
Area ratio
1.23:1
Absolute difference
7 mm²
Relative difference
23.4%

The Eye-Q 4330z has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Eye-Q 3132zMetricEye-Q 4330z
3.1 MPEffective pixels4.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.15 µmPixel pitch3.04 µm
9.91 µm²Pixel area9.24 µm²
10.09 MP/cm²Pixel density10.82 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
310 gWeight280 g
Secure DigitalStorageCompactFlash type I
2x AABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Eye-Q 4330z has the larger sensor area. The Eye-Q 4330z has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 4330z has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 3132z and Eye-Q 4330z were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 3132z

Released in 2002, Eye-Q 3132z has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 310 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 4330z

Released in 2002, Eye-Q 4330z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras