Reasons to choose Eye-Q 3103
Released in 2002, Eye-Q 3103 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 215 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Concord Eye-Q 3103
vs Concord Eye-Q 4330z
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
Eye-Q 310338 mm²
Eye-Q 4330z- Area ratio
- 1.23:1
- Absolute difference
- 7 mm²
- Relative difference
- 23.4%
The Eye-Q 4330z has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Eye-Q 3103MetricEye-Q 4330z
3.1 MPEffective pixels4.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.15 µmPixel pitch3.04 µm
9.91 µm²Pixel area9.24 µm²
10.09 MP/cm²Pixel density10.82 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
215 gWeight280 g
Secure DigitalStorageCompactFlash type I
2x AABattery4x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Eye-Q 4330z has the larger sensor area. The Eye-Q 3103 has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 4330z has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 3103 and Eye-Q 4330z were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Eye-Q 4330z
Released in 2002, Eye-Q 4330z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.