CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord Eye-Q 2133z
vs Concord Eye-Q 3103

Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 2133z

Concord / 2002

Eye-Q 2133z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 3103

Concord / 2002

Eye-Q 3103

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
Eye-Q 2133z
31 mm²
Eye-Q 3103
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Eye-Q 2133z and Eye-Q 3103 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Eye-Q 2133zMetricEye-Q 3103
2 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.92 µmPixel pitch3.15 µm
15.36 µm²Pixel area9.91 µm²
6.51 MP/cm²Pixel density10.09 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
238 gWeight215 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Eye-Q 2133z and Eye-Q 3103 have the same sensor area. The Eye-Q 3103 has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 3103 has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 2133z and Eye-Q 3103 were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 2133z

Released in 2002, Eye-Q 2133z has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 238 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 3103

Released in 2002, Eye-Q 3103 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 215 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras