Reasons to choose Eye-Q 1300
Released in 2002, Eye-Q 1300 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Concord Eye-Q 1300
vs Concord Eye-Q Go 2000
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
Eye-Q 130038 mm²
Eye-Q Go 2000- Area ratio
- 1.23:1
- Absolute difference
- 7 mm²
- Relative difference
- 23.4%
The Eye-Q Go 2000 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Eye-Q 1300MetricEye-Q Go 2000
1.3 MPEffective pixels2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.86 µmPixel pitch4.35 µm
23.63 µm²Pixel area18.95 µm²
4.23 MP/cm²Pixel density5.28 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight125 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
1x CR123 LithiumBattery1x CR123 Lithium
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Eye-Q Go 2000 has the larger sensor area. The Eye-Q 1300 has the lighter body. The Eye-Q Go 2000 has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 1300 and Eye-Q Go 2000 were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Eye-Q Go 2000
Released in 2002, Eye-Q Go 2000 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.