CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord Eye-Q 1000
vs Concord Eye-Q 2040

Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 1000

Concord / 2003

Eye-Q 1000

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 2040

Concord / 2003

Eye-Q 2040

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
Eye-Q 1000
31 mm²
Eye-Q 2040
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Eye-Q 1000 and Eye-Q 2040 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Eye-Q 1000MetricEye-Q 2040
1.3 MPEffective pixels2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
4.86 µmPixel pitch3.92 µm
23.63 µm²Pixel area15.36 µm²
4.23 MP/cm²Pixel density6.51 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
45 gWeight116 g
—StorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AAABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Eye-Q 1000 and Eye-Q 2040 have the same sensor area. The Eye-Q 1000 has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 2040 has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 1000 and Eye-Q 2040 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 1000

Released in 2003, Eye-Q 1000 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 45 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 2040

Released in 2003, Eye-Q 2040 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 116 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras