CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord 5345z
vs Concord Eye-Q 5062AF

Archive illustration for Concord 5345z

Concord / 2004

5345z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 5062AF

Concord / 2004

Eye-Q 5062AF

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
5345z
38 mm²
Eye-Q 5062AF
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The 5345z and Eye-Q 5062AF have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

5345zMetricEye-Q 5062AF
5.36 MPEffective pixels5.04 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.66 µmPixel pitch2.74 µm
7.07 µm²Pixel area7.52 µm²
14.14 MP/cm²Pixel density13.3 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight120 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The 5345z and Eye-Q 5062AF have the same sensor area. The Eye-Q 5062AF has the lighter body. The 5345z has the higher effective resolution. The 5345z and Eye-Q 5062AF were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose 5345z

Released in 2004, 5345z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.36 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 5062AF

Released in 2004, Eye-Q 5062AF has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.04 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras