Reasons to choose 5040
Released in 2005, 5040 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.1 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Concord 5040
vs Concord ES510z
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
504038 mm²
ES510z- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The 5040 and ES510z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
5040MetricES510z
5.1 MPEffective pixels5.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.73 µmPixel pitch2.73 µm
7.43 µm²Pixel area7.43 µm²
13.46 MP/cm²Pixel density13.46 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight140 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AAABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The 5040 and ES510z have the same sensor area. The 5040 has the lighter body. The 5040 and ES510z have the same effective resolution. The 5040 and ES510z were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose ES510z
Released in 2005, ES510z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.