CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio QV-8000SX
vs Ricoh RDC-4300

Archive illustration for Casio QV-8000SX

Casio / 1999

QV-8000SX

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh RDC-4300

Ricoh / 1998

RDC-4300

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

17 mm²
QV-8000SX
17 mm²
RDC-4300
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The QV-8000SX and RDC-4300 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

QV-8000SXMetricRDC-4300
1.2 MPEffective pixels1.2 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor4.8 × 3.6
3.79 µmPixel pitch3.79 µm
14.4 µm²Pixel area14.4 µm²
6.94 MP/cm²Pixel density6.94 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
320 gWeight320 g
Compact FlashStorageSmartMedia
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The QV-8000SX and RDC-4300 have the same sensor area. The QV-8000SX and RDC-4300 have the same body weight. The QV-8000SX and RDC-4300 have the same effective resolution. The QV-8000SX is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose QV-8000SX

Released in 1999, QV-8000SX has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose RDC-4300

Released in 1998, RDC-4300 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras