CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio GV-10
vs Casio GV-20

Archive illustration for Casio GV-10

Casio / 2001

GV-10

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Casio GV-20

Casio / 2002

GV-20

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
GV-10
15 mm²
GV-20
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The GV-10 and GV-20 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

GV-10MetricGV-20
1.2 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor4.5 × 3.37
3.55 µmPixel pitch2.83 µm
12.64 µm²Pixel area7.98 µm²
7.91 MP/cm²Pixel density12.53 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
320 gWeight320 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The GV-10 and GV-20 have the same sensor area. The GV-10 and GV-20 have the same body weight. The GV-20 has the higher effective resolution. The GV-20 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose GV-10

Released in 2001, GV-10 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose GV-20

Released in 2002, GV-20 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras