Reasons to choose Exilim Pro EX-F1
Released in 2008, Exilim Pro EX-F1 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 671 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1
vs Praktica Luxmedia 10 X3
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Exilim Pro EX-F138 mm²
Luxmedia 10 X3- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Exilim Pro EX-F1 and Luxmedia 10 X3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Exilim Pro EX-F1MetricLuxmedia 10 X3
6 MPEffective pixels10.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.51 µmPixel pitch1.94 µm
6.32 µm²Pixel area3.75 µm²
15.83 MP/cm²Pixel density26.65 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
671 gWeight140 g
MultiMedia, SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Casio NP-100 Li Ion batteryBattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Exilim Pro EX-F1 and Luxmedia 10 X3 have the same sensor area. The Luxmedia 10 X3 has the lighter body. The Luxmedia 10 X3 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim Pro EX-F1 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Luxmedia 10 X3
Released in 2006, Luxmedia 10 X3 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.