Reasons to choose Exilim Pro EX-F1
Released in 2008, Exilim Pro EX-F1 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 671 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1
vs Kodak EasyShare C875
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Exilim Pro EX-F138 mm²
EasyShare C875- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Exilim Pro EX-F1 and EasyShare C875 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Exilim Pro EX-F1MetricEasyShare C875
6 MPEffective pixels8 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.51 µmPixel pitch2.18 µm
6.32 µm²Pixel area4.74 µm²
15.83 MP/cm²Pixel density21.11 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
671 gWeight177 g
MultiMedia, SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Casio NP-100 Li Ion batteryBatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Exilim Pro EX-F1 and EasyShare C875 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare C875 has the lighter body. The EasyShare C875 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim Pro EX-F1 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare C875
Released in 2006, EasyShare C875 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 177 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.