Reasons to choose Exilim EX-Z3000
Released in 2011, Exilim EX-Z3000 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.57 MP effective resolution, and a 148 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio Exilim EX-Z3000
vs Casio Exilim EX-ZR200
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Exilim EX-Z300028 mm²
Exilim EX-ZR200- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Exilim EX-Z3000 and Exilim EX-ZR200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Exilim EX-Z3000MetricExilim EX-ZR200
16.57 MPEffective pixels16.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.31 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.72 µm²Pixel area1.77 µm²
58.22 MP/cm²Pixel density56.57 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
148 gWeight205 g
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-ion NP-130 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Exilim EX-Z3000 and Exilim EX-ZR200 have the same sensor area. The Exilim EX-Z3000 has the lighter body. The Exilim EX-Z3000 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-Z3000 and Exilim EX-ZR200 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Exilim EX-ZR200
Released in 2011, Exilim EX-ZR200 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 205 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.