Reasons to choose Exilim EX-S2
Released in 2002, Exilim EX-S2 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 86 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio Exilim EX-S2
vs Casio QV-R3
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Exilim EX-S238 mm²
QV-R3- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Exilim EX-S2 and QV-R3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Exilim EX-S2MetricQV-R3
2 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.35 µmPixel pitch3.5 µm
18.95 µm²Pixel area12.22 µm²
5.28 MP/cm²Pixel density8.18 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
86 gWeight240 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Exilim EX-S2 and QV-R3 have the same sensor area. The Exilim EX-S2 has the lighter body. The QV-R3 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-S2 and QV-R3 were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose QV-R3
Released in 2002, QV-R3 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 240 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.