Reasons to choose Exilim EX-FH150
Released in 2010, Exilim EX-FH150 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio Exilim EX-FH150
vs Samsung NV9
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Exilim EX-FH15028 mm²
NV9- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Exilim EX-FH150 and NV9 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Exilim EX-FH150MetricNV9
10.1 MPEffective pixels10.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.68 µmPixel pitch1.67 µm
2.82 µm²Pixel area2.79 µm²
35.49 MP/cm²Pixel density35.84 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight140 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, SDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable (SLB-0837B) Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Exilim EX-FH150 and NV9 have the same sensor area. The NV9 has the lighter body. The NV9 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-FH150 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose NV9
Released in 2008, NV9 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.