Reasons to choose PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Released in 2012, PowerShot ELPH 520 HS has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
vs Canon PowerShot S95
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS42 mm²
PowerShot S95- Area ratio
- 1.49:1
- Absolute difference
- 14 mm²
- Relative difference
- 49.2%
The PowerShot S95 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
PowerShot ELPH 520 HSMetricPowerShot S95
10.1 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor7.53 × 5.64
1.68 µmPixel pitch2.06 µm
2.82 µm²Pixel area4.25 µm²
35.49 MP/cm²Pixel density23.55 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor4.6
—Maximum video—
155 gWeight193 g
microSD/microSDHC/microSDXCStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion NB-9L rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion NB-6L rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The PowerShot S95 has the larger sensor area. The PowerShot ELPH 520 HS has the lighter body. The PowerShot ELPH 520 HS has the higher effective resolution. The PowerShot ELPH 520 HS is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose PowerShot S95
Released in 2010, PowerShot S95 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 193 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.