Reasons to choose PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
Released in 2012, PowerShot ELPH 320 HS has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
vs Canon PowerShot N2
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
PowerShot ELPH 320 HS28 mm²
PowerShot N2- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The PowerShot ELPH 320 HS and PowerShot N2 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
PowerShot ELPH 320 HSMetricPowerShot N2
16.1 MPEffective pixels16.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.77 µm²Pixel area1.77 µm²
56.57 MP/cm²Pixel density56.57 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
145 gWeight201 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStoragemicroSD, microSDHC, microSDXC
Lithium-Ion NB-11L rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryRechargeable Lithium-ion Battery NB-9L Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The PowerShot ELPH 320 HS and PowerShot N2 have the same sensor area. The PowerShot ELPH 320 HS has the lighter body. The PowerShot ELPH 320 HS and PowerShot N2 have the same effective resolution. The PowerShot N2 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose PowerShot N2
Released in 2014, PowerShot N2 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 201 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.