CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon PowerShot A40
vs Pentax EI-200

Archive illustration for Canon PowerShot A40

Canon / 2002

PowerShot A40

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax EI-200

Pentax / 2000

EI-200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
PowerShot A40
21 mm²
EI-200
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PowerShot A40 and EI-200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

PowerShot A40MetricEI-200
1.9 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.35 µmPixel pitch3.35 µm
11.22 µm²Pixel area11.22 µm²
8.91 MP/cm²Pixel density8.91 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
250 gWeight390 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompact Flash
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PowerShot A40 and EI-200 have the same sensor area. The PowerShot A40 has the lighter body. The PowerShot A40 and EI-200 have the same effective resolution. The PowerShot A40 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PowerShot A40

Released in 2002, PowerShot A40 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 250 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EI-200

Released in 2000, EI-200 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 390 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras