Reasons to choose PowerShot 350
Released in 1997, PowerShot 350 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon PowerShot 350
vs Nikon Coolpix 600
VS
Sensor area
17 mm²
PowerShot 35021 mm²
Coolpix 600- Area ratio
- 1.23:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 23.4%
The Coolpix 600 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
PowerShot 350MetricCoolpix 600
0.3 MPEffective pixels0.8 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor5.33 × 4
7.59 µmPixel pitch5.16 µm
57.6 µm²Pixel area26.65 µm²
1.74 MP/cm²Pixel density3.75 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
320 gWeight230 g
Compact FlashStorageCompactFlash type I
Canon NiCD (optional)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Coolpix 600 has the larger sensor area. The Coolpix 600 has the lighter body. The Coolpix 600 has the higher effective resolution. The Coolpix 600 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Coolpix 600
Released in 1998, Coolpix 600 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 0.8 MP effective resolution, and a 230 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.