Reasons to choose EOS M100
Released in 2017, EOS M100 has about 332 mm² of sensor area, 24.2 MP effective resolution, and a 302 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon EOS M100
vs Fujifilm X-T20
VS
Sensor area
332 mm²
EOS M100368 mm²
X-T20- Area ratio
- 1.11:1
- Absolute difference
- 36 mm²
- Relative difference
- 10.8%
The X-T20 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EOS M100MetricX-T20
24.2 MPEffective pixels24.3 MP
22.3 × 14.9Sensor23.6 × 15.6
3.71 µmPixel pitch3.89 µm
13.73 µm²Pixel area15.15 µm²
7.28 MP/cm²Pixel density6.6 MP/cm²
1.61Crop factor1.53
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
302 gWeight383 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
LP-E12 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryNP-W126S lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The X-T20 has the larger sensor area. The EOS M100 has the lighter body. The X-T20 has the higher effective resolution. The EOS M100 and X-T20 were both released in 2017. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose X-T20
Released in 2017, X-T20 has about 368 mm² of sensor area, 24.3 MP effective resolution, and a 383 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.