CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon EOS 10D
vs Canon EOS-1D

Archive illustration for Canon EOS 10D

Canon / 2003

EOS 10D

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Canon EOS-1D

Canon / 2001

EOS-1D

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

343 mm²
EOS 10D
548 mm²
EOS-1D
Area ratio
1.6:1
Absolute difference
205 mm²
Relative difference
59.9%

The EOS-1D has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EOS 10DMetricEOS-1D
6.3 MPEffective pixels4.1 MP
22.7 × 15.1Sensor28.7 × 19.1
7.38 µmPixel pitch11.56 µm
54.41 µm²Pixel area133.7 µm²
1.84 MP/cm²Pixel density0.75 MP/cm²
1.59Crop factor1.26
—Maximum video—
875 gWeight1,585 g
Compact Flash (Type I or II)StorageCompact Flash (Type I or II)
Canon Lithium-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryCanon Lithium-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EOS-1D has the larger sensor area. The EOS 10D has the lighter body. The EOS 10D has the higher effective resolution. The EOS 10D is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EOS 10D

Released in 2003, EOS 10D has about 343 mm² of sensor area, 6.3 MP effective resolution, and a 875 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EOS-1D

Released in 2001, EOS-1D has about 548 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 1,585 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras