Reasons to choose EOS 1000D
Released in 2008, EOS 1000D has about 329 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 502 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon EOS 1000D
vs Canon EOS 350D
VS
Sensor area
329 mm²
EOS 1000D329 mm²
EOS 350D- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EOS 1000D and EOS 350D have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 3 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EOS 1000DMetricEOS 350D
10.1 MPEffective pixels8 MP
22.2 × 14.8Sensor22.2 × 14.8
5.7 µmPixel pitch6.41 µm
32.53 µm²Pixel area41.07 µm²
3.07 MP/cm²Pixel density2.43 MP/cm²
1.62Crop factor1.62
—Maximum video—
502 gWeight540 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
Lithium-Ion BP-511A rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion NB-3L battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EOS 1000D and EOS 350D have the same sensor area. The EOS 1000D has the lighter body. The EOS 1000D has the higher effective resolution. The EOS 1000D is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EOS 350D
Released in 2005, EOS 350D has about 329 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 540 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.