Reasons to choose DC E820
Released in 2007, DC E820 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
BenQ DC E820
vs BenQ DC X735
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
DC E82025 mm²
DC X735- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DC E820 and DC X735 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
DC E820MetricDC X735
8 MPEffective pixels7.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.86 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area3.45 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density28.99 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight120 g
Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC E820 and DC X735 have the same sensor area. The DC X735 has the lighter body. The DC E820 has the higher effective resolution. The DC E820 and DC X735 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC X735
Released in 2007, DC X735 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.2 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.