CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC E820
vs BenQ DC T800

Archive illustration for BenQ DC E820

BenQ / 2007

DC E820

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC T800

BenQ / 2007

DC T800

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC E820
27 mm²
DC T800
Area ratio
1.1:1
Absolute difference
2 mm²
Relative difference
9.7%

The DC T800 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC E820MetricDC T800
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.03 × 4.52
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.85 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area3.41 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density29.35 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.74
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight120 g
Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC T800 has the larger sensor area. The DC T800 has the lighter body. The DC E820 and DC T800 have the same effective resolution. The DC E820 and DC T800 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC E820

Released in 2007, DC E820 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC T800

Released in 2007, DC T800 has about 27 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras